How you can save your own life with DIY water purification
The life-saving water purifier, called the ‘water purifier’ can save lives, with scientists discovering that it is the most effective method of disinfection for cleaning up human waste.
The company behind the product, which can be installed in homes and businesses, has announced it is developing a water purifying device to be available to businesses in the future.
Water purifiers are one of the most common disinfectants used to disinfect household and industrial waste.
They remove harmful bacteria and contaminants from the environment by removing solids, such as salt, from water and air.
The water can then be used to clean up the water supply or to clean and disinfect surfaces, such it in hotels and restaurants.
Water and sewage are both essential components of everyday life.
“This product will help us further develop our innovative water purifiers for both residential and commercial uses,” said Dr. Tae Hyun Yoon, CEO of The North Shore Water and Waste Treatment Corporation.
“The device is an innovative, high-efficiency, cost-effective solution that will be available for consumers in the near future.”
The company plans to launch a commercial version of the product by the end of 2018.
The device works by using a water treatment system, which includes a filter, an oxygen source and an electric fan.
It can then extract and filter water to be purified.
It is the same water that is used in water purifications, which are commonly used for the cleaning of human waste, but the water used to purify human waste is much cleaner than that used to filter and purify water.
“We’ve been testing this technology and it works like a charm,” said Kevin M. Kim, a professor of chemical and biophysical engineering at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and an inventor of the water purifyr.
“If you want to remove harmful pathogens, this is the device that works for you.”
The device is also extremely environmentally friendly.
The system uses solar panels and a heat exchanger to collect water and then purify it using a small water filter.
The process is energy-efficient, according to the company.
“Our team is focused on developing this product to be cost-efficient and scalable, so that the technology can be adopted by large companies across the world,” said Kim.
The team plans to take this technology to market by the first quarter of 2019.
The first batch of water purifies is currently being developed and will be tested on the human population.
A second batch of the device is planned for later this year.
The technology is still in its early stages and it will be interesting to see how effective the device will be at removing contaminants.
This device has a small, compact design that can be mounted inside a home or business, said Kim, adding that it can be used in places where it would be difficult or impossible to use traditional water purging equipment.
“It is a good example of a breakthrough technology that we have been working on for years,” said M.K. Kim.
“There are many new technologies that are coming out all the time, but this is one of them that’s actually coming along,” Kim said.
“You will be able to use this product for many applications in the long term.”
“This device will allow you to clean out your home, your office, your home and even your business, but you won’t be cleaning it up again,” said Lee Kim, another founder of The South Shore Water Treatment Corporation and a scientist at the university.
“Instead of being clean, you will be a cleaner,” Kim added.
Kim and others believe the device could be used as a form of self-healing.
He said that this would mean that the device would be more effective in situations where the person has lost a significant amount of weight.
“As the body ages, the kidneys can become less effective at absorbing carbon dioxide, and that’s when we would like to be able get rid of all the toxins that are still there,” Kim explained.
“I think it’s a really good product that will help people.”
The South Carolina-based company is currently working on the technology, with the company hoping to release the device in 2019.
“To date, this has been the most successful, cost effective and environmentally friendly water purified water purifcant device we’ve seen,” said Steve M. McCarron, senior director of product development and product development for The Northshore Water and Wastewater Corporation.
When the new boss doesn’t want to pay for you to stay
When a new boss asks for a pay cut, you have the option of accepting it.
A new mayor in Chicago’s Liberty Personnel Services (LPS) Board of Directors said in a letter to employees last month that she “believes that your personal and professional freedom to choose how you work is essential to your job performance.”
LPS’s director of human resources told the staff that she was seeking a pay increase and was “pushing for an increase to $13.50/hour.”
The letter was obtained by the Chicago Tribune, and the board’s president, Mary Lou Hagen, responded in a Facebook post that LPS will seek a $13-an-hour increase “for the first time in its history.”
But LPS employees who are eligible for raises are given the option to apply for one, and LPS Board President Mary LouHagen is asking employees to do so, saying, “We believe that the increased salary should be offered for an employee’s own choice.”
LPLS is part of a nationwide union of city public employees.
LPS does not have a policy on employee choice, and employees are free to make the decision they think best for themselves, but LPS has had a contentious relationship with unions in recent years.
In 2016, LPS laid off a full quarter of its workforce, which included more than 100 police officers, as the result of a citywide strike.
The city later settled with the police union for a total of $20 million.
LPLP officials said in 2016 that the layoffs were in response to an “increased workload” of police officers and a “higher cost to taxpayers.”
The city said at the time that LPL was being held to the same standard as public employees in terms of staffing, overtime pay, and benefits.
In 2015, the Chicago Teachers Union voted to unionize and form a bargaining unit, and in 2016, the union filed a lawsuit challenging the city’s use of overtime pay.
In December 2016, a federal judge found that LPGs contract with LPS violated the National Labor Relations Act.
A federal judge in 2016 also ruled that LPMS violated the Fair Labor Standards Act by failing to offer a salary raise to its employees who requested it.
LPG officials also disputed the federal judge’s finding that LPA employees were not treated fairly under their collective bargaining agreement.
LPD fired nearly 40 officers after they refused to participate in a “coup” that was scheduled to take place on November 2.
LPA officials argued that the police department was not obligated to provide a raise, but the judge disagreed.
He ruled that the department could only be held accountable if it gave a raise to officers who chose to walk off the job.
A spokeswoman for the LPA did not respond to a request for comment.
A spokesperson for LPL said LPL has not filed a complaint with the National Employment Law Project or the Office of the Special Counsel, but it did say that it has been “forced to take action because of our failure to pay our employees” and because of the “public’s interest in the quality of life for our officers.”
LPD spokesperson Adam Collins said LPS did not “make any promises or threats” to pay raises, and said LPG did not request an increase for 2016 because the department was already overfunded.
Collins said in an email that “the city has been in a constant state of emergency since the 2016 police officers strike.”
He said the department had been in negotiations with LPLs bargaining unit “for a while,” but LPL had not reached a deal with LPD.
“We’ve been working to resolve our differences, but unfortunately, they have not been resolved,” Collins said.
LPC spokesperson Erin Coyle said in February that the city was not in compliance with the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) guidelines on collective bargaining.
“The city does not allow city employees to make personal choices regarding whether to work with their own union or not,” Coyle wrote.
“That is why the city is not in a position to provide pay raises to LPL workers.”
LPC’s contract with the city expired in 2020, but in 2017, LPL’s leaders voted to form a new bargaining unit.
LPNS also has had an off-the-record, confidential “labor peace” process with the LPL.
The process, which has been widely publicized, has involved LPL employees holding meetings, and then LPL officials offering a pay raise in a public forum.
LPMs first round of pay raises took place in April.
In October, the city announced it was ending the process altogether, citing the state’s moratorium on collective bargaining for public employees and a lack of public trust in the process.
Lpls leaders said in December that the process had been going on for months, and that the LPD’s contract “is not enforceable.”
US to cut $2bn from Africa’s aid budget
By MARTIN GUTIERREZ, Reuters UNITED NATIONS – The United States on Tuesday will cut its funding for Africa by $2 billion, the World Bank said, the first time the U.S. has scaled back aid to a continent that has struggled with severe economic turmoil.
The U.N. body said the cuts would be phased in over the next two years, as the U:s administration seeks to focus on other issues such as the Ebola pandemic.
The United States and the other six major donors are among a handful of countries that have pledged to boost their aid to Africa’s poorest countries.
“The United Kingdom has pledged $1 billion in aid for Africa, which will now be reduced by $1.4 billion,” the World Development Report, a monthly report on the continent, said.
It said the U-S.
would also cut funding to the United Nations Children’s Fund and the African Union Development Fund by about $400 million each, and $1 million each from the World Trade Organization.
The World Bank also said that in 2017, it expected the United States to cut by about 30 percent its funding to countries in Africa, the Middle East, Central Asia and Eastern Europe.
That would include the U.-S.
and the EU, as well as Canada, Mexico and Norway.
The budget cut comes amid increasing pressure from the White House and U.K. Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson over the U .
S. administration’s handling of Ebola and other humanitarian crises.
The White House is pushing the U :s State Department to take a stronger stance against the U -S.
over its response to the pandemic, and Johnson has threatened to withdraw from the trade pact that the U, along with the European Union, signed in 2016.
In February, Johnson warned the Whitehouse against withdrawing from the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, saying the pact would be a disaster for the world economy.
Johnson has also said the trade deal could result in job losses in Europe and a reduction in the size of the European economy.
U.S.-based environmental groups have criticized the U.’s trade stance as an unfair advantage for U.s businesses that are not the biggest emitters of greenhouse gases.
A new report by the World Resources Institute said that the United states trade deficit with Africa would rise to $50.3 billion in 2030 from $16.3 trillion in 2016 and is expected to reach $63.7 billion by 2030.
The report also said U. S. firms have increased their exports to Africa by a median of 13 percent since 2016.
That figure would rise if the trade agreement is not implemented, the WRI said.
The WRI also said there are over 8 million people living in extreme poverty in Africa.